[花邊] TNT4老談尼克活塞結尾爭議球

https://youtu.be/np5H_yP3L0M?t=5m40s

Ernie: Knicks will go home and try to close it out on Tuesday.
Meantime, crew chief David Guthrie says during live play it was judged that Josh Hart made a legal defensive play. After post-game review, we observed that Hart makes body contact that is more than marginal to Hardaway Jr., and a foul should have been called. Now again, we take a look.

Ernie： 尼克隊將回到主場，試圖在星期二結束系列賽。
同時，裁判長David Guthrie表示，在比賽中判定Josh Hart的防守是合法的。但賽後回放中，我們發現Hart與Hardaway Jr.有明顯的身體接觸，應該吹判犯規。我們再來看一次。

Barkley: They just blew it, plain and simple. Nothing to think about. They justblew it. My question to you, Ernie—
Hypothetical.

Barkley： 他們就是搞砸了，很簡單，沒什麼好想的。他們就是搞砸了。我有個問題要問你，Ernie——
一個假設性的問題。如果Pistons有挑戰權，如果那個球可以挑戰——

Ernie: No, there wasn’t a whistle.
Ernie： 不，那球沒有哨音。

Barkley: Okay, good call. I just—that’s why I’m asking.
Barkley： 好，合理。我就是想確認一下。

Kenny: Well, that’s my thing. I have a question for both of you and Shaq, because I know both of you guys do not like the fact that the NBA comes out and doesthat. I’m just saying, okay, this play happens, and there’s no memo from the NBA. What would you like the NBA to do?
Kenny： 那就是我的問題。我想問你們兩位還有Shaq，因為我知道你們不喜歡NBA賽後出來這樣發聲明。我的意思是，假設這個判決發生了，但NBA沒有出任何聲明，你們會希望NBA怎麼做？

Shaq: Nothing. There’s nothing that can be done, Kenny.
Shaq： 什麼都不用做，Kenny，沒什麼可以做的。

Kenny: Just let it sit?
Kenny： 就這樣放著不管？

Shaq: The game’s over. It doesn’t matter what you say. The game’s over.
Shaq： 比賽已經結束了。你說什麼都沒用了，結束了。

Kenny: You wouldn’t want anything to say?
Kenny： 你不希望說點什麼？

Shaq: No. The game is over, doesn’t matter.
Shaq： 不，沒意義，已經結束了。

Kenny: So you don’t think that if we were sitting here and there was nothing that said that, we would be challenging it and we’d be like, “What does the league say about this?”
Kenny： 所以你不覺得，如果我們現在坐在這裡，聯盟沒有發任何聲明，我們會一直追問「聯盟怎麼看這個判罰」嗎？

Shaq: Well, they said it.
Shaq： 他們現在已經說了。

Kenny: No, I’m saying, what would you like to happen if they—
Kenny： 不，我是問，如果聯盟什麼都沒說，你希望怎樣？

Barkley: I don’t think there’s anything. Because all you did was hang them out to dry. That’s all you did.
Barkley： 我覺得沒有必要。因為你發聲明只是把裁判推上火線，讓他們背鍋而已。

Kenny: So you would like nothing to be said, no matter what happens?
Kenny： 所以無論發生什麼事，你都希望聯盟什麼都不說？

Barkley: What is the purpose of what they put out today? I’m just asking you aquestion.
Barkley： 我就問問，你覺得他們今天發聲明的意義是什麼？

Kenny: Well, for me, what I think is—because if the play was the other way, we’re going to hear what the league thinks. So if they would say, “No, he actually did not get fouled because Tim Hardaway jumped into him,” and the rule is—because there are rules that change all the time. The rule is, when I remember when Reggie Miller used to not get called or kicking his leg out, the new rule now states if Reggie puts his leg out, it’s an offensive foul. So all of a sudden you have clarity. But what would you like to happen in this instance that’s so controversial?
Kenny： 對我來說，如果判決是相反的，聯盟還是會出來表態。所以，如果他們說「其實Tim Hardaway是自己跳進去的，沒有犯規」，那這就是規則，而且規則一直在改。就像以前Reggie Miller踢腿不會被吹，現在新規則說踢腿是進攻犯規。但這次這麼有爭議，你希望聯盟怎麼做？

Barkley: Because nothing gonna happen.
Barkley： 因為什麼都不會改變。

Kenny: So just be quiet?
Kenny： 所以乾脆保持沉默？

Ernie: You know what I’d like to see?
I’d like to see another voice coming out of Secaucus that says, “Hey, that’s
a game-deciding play. I’ve looked at it, and it’s a foul.”
Ernie： 你知道我希望怎樣嗎？我希望有來自Secaucus（NBA總部回放中心）另一個聲音出來說：「嘿，這個球決定了比賽，我看過了，這是犯規。」

Kenny: That’s what they did!
Kenny： 他們不是已經這麼做了嗎！

Ernie: AFTER the game! I’m saying, after it happens, before you say the game is over, you say, “Hey, hey, hey, hey.” You’ve got somebody else who is sitting there in New York who says, “Hey, this game can’t end this way. There was contact. There was a foul. Let’s pick it up right there.”
Ernie： 是比賽後才說啊！我意思是比賽當下，在宣布比賽結束前，有人在紐約說：「等一下，等一下！這球有身體接觸，有犯規，不能這樣結束，從那個時間點繼續比賽。」

Kenny: If there’s no whistle, how can you make that call?
Kenny： 可是如果沒有哨音，你怎麼能直接做出這個判決？

Ernie: That’s where your voice comes in.
Ernie： 這就是需要另一個聲音介入的地方。

Kenny: Actually, goaltending—the last shot—so it doesn’t—
Kenny： 其實，像最後一球如果是干擾球判定——

Ernie: Yeah, well fine. I would like an “eye in the sky.” Call it whatever you want. I want somebody to say, “You know what? The game can’t end like that.”Ernie： 對啊。所以我希望要有一個「天眼」，隨便你叫什麼都行，只要有人可以說：「比賽不能這樣結束。」

Barkley: And it’s very rare that one play decides wins and losses. That play decided wins and losses. Like, I say a turnover—like, he didn’t mean to turn that ball over—or a missed free throw, that stuff happens.
Barkley： 通常一個回合不會決定勝負，但這球真的決定了勝負。失誤、罰球不中這些是意外，但這球不是。

Kenny: How far do you go with it? If a guy stepped out of bounds as he was driving? You know what? Like the other night—
Kenny： 可是這樣範圍要劃到多大？如果有人切入時踩線呢？就像前幾天——

Ernie: If it’s a game-deciding play—If it’s a game-deciding play, last few seconds, you’ve got to get that right. You can’t come out after the game and say, “Oh, we screwed that up. Sorry.”
Ernie： 如果是決定勝負的球——如果是最後幾秒的球，你就必須吹對，不能賽後才說：「喔，我們搞砸了，抱歉。」

Barkley: 100%, Ernie. When it decides the game, it can’t decide the game. A mistake can never decide the game.
Barkley： 沒錯，Ernie。當這球決定比賽時，就不能容許錯誤。錯誤絕不能決定比賽結果。

Shaq: Not only that, it might decide the whole series.
Shaq： 不只是比賽，這可能影響整個系列賽。

Barkley: It decided the whole series. More than likely. Because listen, 2–2 istotally different than 3–1. Totally different.
Barkley： 它已經決定了整個系列賽。2比2跟3比1完全不一樣，完全不同。

Kenny: I think—just my opinion—I would think that if a whistle was blown, then the “eye in the sky” could come in. But the “eye in the sky” coming back fo
r random plays across 820 games throughout the regular season and playoffs is just too much to ask.
Kenny： 我覺得——只是我的看法——如果場上有吹哨，「天眼」可以介入。但如果要在常
規賽和季後賽820場比賽裡的每一個隨機回合都要求介入這樣的細節，那就太難了。

Ernie: I just think you got to get it right.
Ernie： 我只覺得，該吹對的球就要吹對。

賽後的裁判報告真的是沒比賽，以這球而言活塞真的是被偷了一場，從2-2變成1-3落後

最後放個糖糖讚

https://i.imgur.com/bVDBGNI.jpeg

--