PTT評價

[爆卦] 第一顆木材電晶體研發成功

看板Gossiping標題[爆卦] 第一顆木材電晶體研發成功作者
STAV72
(刁民黨黨務主委)
時間推噓74 推:89 噓:15 →:63

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2218380120

https://imgur.com/eoL9uBW

(機器翻譯,略譯稿)_

在之前的試驗中,用木頭製成的晶體管只能調節離子傳輸。當離子耗盡時,晶體管停止工作。然而,來至瑞典林雪坪的研究人員開發的晶體管可以持續工作並調節電流而不會惡化。

研究人員使用輕木來製造他們的晶體管,因為所涉及的技術需要一種結構均勻的無紋木材。他們去除了木質素,只留下長的纖維素纖維,其通道位於木質素所在的位置。

然後,這些通道被稱為 PEDOT:PSS 的導電塑料或聚合物填充,從而形成導電的木質材料。伊薩克·恩奎斯特。

研究人員用它來製造木質晶體管,並可以證明它能夠調節電流並在選定的輸出水平上提供連續功能。它還可以打開和關閉電源,儘管有一定的延遲——關閉電源大約需要一秒鐘;
上,大約五秒鐘。

電子設備監管

可能的應用可能包括調節電子設備,這是林雪坪大學另一個強大的研究領域。晶體管溝道如此之大的一個優點是它可能比普通有機晶體管承受更高的電流,這對於某些未來應用可能很重要。

Electrical current modulation in wood electrochemical transistor
Van Chinh Tran https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-4914, Gabriella G.
Mastantuoni, Marzieh Zabihipour, +4, and Isak Engquist
[email protected] Info & Affiliations

Edited by Peter Fratzl, Max-Planck-Institut fur Kolloid und
Grenzflachenforschung, Potsdam, Germany; received October 31, 2022; accepted
March 1, 2023 by Editorial Board Member Joanna Aizenberg
April 24, 2023
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218380120

Significance
Abstract
1. Results and Discussion
2. Conclusions
3. Experimental Section
4. Characterization

Significance

The orthotropic 3D microstructure has recently promoted wood as a template
for applications in wood-based energy and electronic devices. Different
varieties of electroconductive wood are widely reported; however, modulating
the wood’s electrical conductivity without changing its chemical composition
has not been done and remains challenging. In this work, we present an
approach to preparing conductive wood (CW), in which the electrical
conductivity can be modulated using an external potential. This has resulted
in a transistor where all three terminals are made of conductive wood and
which can be operated continuously at the selected conductivity without beinglimited by, e.g., saturation effects. We expect this device and concept will
be a stepping stone for the development of wood-based electrical components.

意義

正交各向異性 3D 微結構最近將木材作為模板推廣到木基能源和電子設備中。不同品種的導電木被廣泛報導;然而,在不改變其化學成分的情況下調節木材的導電性尚未完成,並且仍然具有挑戰性。在這項工作中,我們提出了一種製備導電木材 (CW) 的方法,其中導電率可以使用外部電位進行調製。這導致晶體管的所有三個端子均由導電木材製成,並且可以在選定的導電率下連續工作,而不受例如飽和效應的限制。我們預計該設備和概念將成為開發木質電子元件的墊腳石。

Abstract

The nature of mass transport in plants has recently inspired the development
of low-cost and sustainable wood-based electronics. Herein, we report a wood
electrochemical transistor (WECT) where all three electrodes are fully made
of conductive wood (CW). The CW is prepared using a two-step strategy of wooddelignification followed by wood amalgamation with a mixed electron-ion
conducting polymer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)–polystyrene sulfonate
(PEDOT:PSS). The modified wood has an electrical conductivity of up to 69 Sm1 induced by the formation of PEDOT:PSS microstructures inside the wood 3D
scaffold. CW is then used to fabricate the WECT, which is capable of
modulating an electrical current in a porous and thick transistor channel (1
mm) with an on/off ratio of 50. The device shows a good response to gate
voltage modulation and exhibits dynamic switching properties similar to thoseof an organic electrochemical transistor. This wood-based device and the
proposed working principle demonstrate the possibility to incorporate active
electronic functionality into the wood, suggesting different types of
bio-based electronic devices.
Sign up for PNAS alerts.

抽象的

植物中質量運輸的性質最近激發了低成本和可持續的木基電子產品的發展。在此,我們報告了一種木材電化學晶體管 (WECT),其中所有三個電極都完全由導電木材 (CW) 製成。CW 是使用木材脫木素的兩步策略製備的,然後將木材與混合電子離子導電聚合物聚(
3,4-乙烯二氧噻吩)- 聚苯乙烯磺酸鹽(PEDOT:PSS)混合。改性木材的導電率高達 69Sm -1由 PEDOT:PSS 微結構在木材 3D 支架內的形成引起。然後使用 CW 製造 WECT,它能夠在開/關比為 50 的多孔厚晶體管溝道 (1 mm) 中調製電流。該器件對柵極電壓調製具有良好的響應並表現出動態類似於有機電化學晶體管的開關特性。這種基於木材的設備和擬議的工作原理證明了將活性電子功能整合到木材中的可能性,暗示了不同類型的生物基電子設備。

Get alerts for new articles, or get an alert when an article is cited.

As we step into the era of green technologies, there will be an increasing
distinction between complex, nanoscale electronics on one hand and simple,
large-size or large-area electronics on the other hand, the latter with
special functionalities like biosensing, biointegration, biodegradability,
etc. Bio-based materials will be the underpinning for the development of
these functionalities. During the last decades, cellulose, lignin, conductingpolymers, and other organic or bio-based materials have emerged as potential
templates or active components in various electrical devices (1, 2). Among
these materials, wood stands out when it comes to materials that have the
potential for ion transport and regulation (3). Several studies have shown
that the unique three-dimensional (3D) microstructures of wood lumina are
ideally designed for mass transport in the electrodes of electrochemical
devices (1–4). As a result, wood has been carbonized or functionalized with
conductive materials for applications in supercapacitors, batteries, and
electrochromic screens (2–6). After removing lignin, the open pathways
generated along the wood fibers have been shown to provide promising ion
transport channels in nanofluidic devices (7). Besides that, wood was also
explored in other electrical systems such as triboelectric nanogenerators andelectrical magnetic shielding (8, 9). These achievements indicate that wood
has a huge potential for energy and electronic technology. Wood is
orthotropic, and the directionality can provide advantages for organic
transistor performance. However, among many reported devices using a wood
template, there is, to the best of our knowledge, yet no report of an
electrical transistor made of wood or even of electronically induced
modulation of conductivity in wood-based conductors.

In order to transform wood to be an active component in a conventional
transistor [semiconductor transistor or organic electrochemical transistor
(OECT)], tunable electrical conduction is required. The conductivity can be
induced by either wood carbonization or wood modification with conducting
polymers such as polyaniline, polypyrrole, or poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)–polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) (5, 10, 11). However, modulation of the
conductivity of carbon conductors is not possible by electronic or
electrochemical measures, which rules out carbonized wood as a transistor
channel material. This leaves wood modified with conducting polymers, which
will be the material system of choice in the present study. Earlier attempts
for “wood-based transistors” include studies focused on utilizing wood and
its derivatives as a nonconductive substrate(11) for templating a
conventional transistor. In this direction, cellulose paper is a common
choice as it has good flexibility and in some cases also high transparency
(11, 12) Cellulose fibers also show potential as a structural component in
the electrolyte of an electrolyte gate transistor (12). Although cellulose
has been used for silicon-containing transistors (13), transistors not based
on silicon technology could in the future reduce electronic waste and be
biodegradable. In a recent attempt, Li et al. reported a wood-based membrane
that could regulate ion transport through modulation of an external voltage
(7). For this purpose, the authors have coated a gate electrode layer of
silver metal on the wood surface and applied the working principle of a
gating transistor for regulating the ion movement in the membrane. This
results in a kind of ionic transistor, where the authors have proved that
ionic current can be regulated at the nanoscale of the wood scaffold. Such a
device has interesting potential but will also be limited by the need to
transfer between electrical current and ionic current at the electrodes. The
anticipated buildup of ionic charge or electrochemical reaction products at
the interfaces will inhibit the possibility to operate the device in a steadystate for longer periods of time. For the prolonged operation of a
transistor, it is required to rely upon modulation of electrical conduction
(7). Therefore, we need an approach that might utilize the wood ionic
conductivity but also includes sufficient and tunable electrical conduction
in wood for the actual transistor channel. Building on recent progress in
creating PEDOT:PSS-based conductive wood (CW) (10), the principle of
operation for OECTs should be a suitable candidate that could provide such
tunability. The OECT builds upon a transistor channel that is electrically
conductive and that can be electrochemically modulated using ionic transport
between the transistor channel and a gate electrode (14, 15). Since both
these transport mechanisms can be realized within a wood template, a fully
wood-based OECT should be possible to construct. The device is not expected
to have high performance compared to conventional transistors as, in this
work, the primary focus is to prove the hypothesis that electrical
conductivity of the CW can be modulated by using an external potential. The
result of this attempt is a wood transistor, in which all electrodes are madeof CW. We believe this device concept will be a good example for encouraging
the use of earth-abundant and sustainable resources in specific electrical
applications.

As shown in Fig. 1, the wood electrochemical transistor (WECT) was made from
three pieces of CW. The CW was prepared using a two-step strategy of wood
delignification and wood amalgamation with PEDOT:PSS (Fig. 1A and SI
Appendix, Fig. S1). Hardwood balsa was selected owing to its high strength,
low density, and high permeability, as well as its relatively homogeneous
structure with less difference between earlywood and latewood regions
compared to softwood (10, 16). In a preliminary test, we observed that balsa
performed better than birch or ash in preparing high–CW electrodes (SI
Appendix, Fig. S2). The conducting polymer was selected due to its excellent
tunable electrical conductivity shown in numerous examples to provide a
successful OECT channel (14, 17, 18) for, e.g., neuromorphic signaling and
chemical sensing applications (14). The preparation method enables the
formation of a beneficial microstructure of PEDOT:PSS in the wood scaffold
(Fig. 1A). This microstructure not only provides electrical conductivity but
also leaves room to utilize the wood 3D architecture for ionic transport
(17). The CW, after that, was used to construct a WECT with an approach that
is adopted from the fabrication of a double-gate OECT.
Fig. 1.

The schematic diagrams of (A) conductive wood preparation and (B) the wood
electrochemical transistor fabrication processes. (C) From Left to Right:
Front view photograph of a WECT, front view of the WECT configuration, and
section of a wood fiber (conceptual view of transistor’s channel zoom-in)
showing PEDOT:PSS-coated cell wall and electrolyte-transporting lumen.
The assembly of a WECT is explained in Fig. 1B, where two pieces of CW
(longitudinal × tangential × radial = 30 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm) were used as
the bottom and the top gates (denoted as WECT-Gate). Another piece of CW
(longitudinal × tangential × radial = 30 mm × 2 mm× 1 mm) was used as the
transistor channel (WECT-Channel), while a cellulose/polyester lab tissue anda gel–electrolyte mixture were used as separator and electrolyte,
respectively. The final WECT transistor is configured as a double-gate OECT,
in which the main operation process (reduction/oxidation of the conductive
polymer) happens at the microscopic scale in the lumina that form the
transistor channel, Fig. 1C.

1. Results and Discussion

To be employed as an active component in a transistor, the wood must have
sufficient electrical conductivity. In some studies of wood coated with
conducting polymers, it has been found that wood pretreatment methods
including wood delignification can enhance the conductivity (6, 10, 19, 20).
In this work, the balsa wood was delignified before being impregnated with
the PEDOT:PSS suspension.

The effect of wood delignification on the CW conductivity was examined by
varying the wood delignification time from 0.0 (native wood) to 10.0 h, with
results shown in Fig. 2A. We see that the CW-5.0h has the highest
conductivity (69.0 ± 9.0 Sm), while the CW-Native shows the lowest value
of 3.5 ± 1.0 Sm. In native balsa wood, liquid transport occurs mainly in
the lumina of vessels. With the removal of lignin, wood is expected to gain ahigher porosity in the cell walls, and the pits in the cell walls are open
(21), which makes the lumina of fibers and parenchyma cells available to
transport PEDOT:PSS suspension (22). In addition, diffusion pathways are alsoopened up in the middle lamella and cell wall corners in the delignified wood(DW) (23). As a result, the fiber lumina, which are the dominating structuresin balsa wood, can be coated with PEDOT:PSS. The improved PEDOT:PSS diffusionresults in a higher electrical conductivity in the wood. However, when the
delignification time is longer than 5 h, we discovered that the wood fiber
cells collapse as the softened cell walls fall onto each other, causing a “
compacting of the cellular structure.” This is evident in a reduced sample
thickness in the DW-7.5 h and DW-10.0 h samples (SI Appendix, Table S1). The
collapsing hinders efficient polymer diffusion in the structure (24), thus
leading to a drop in the conductivities from 69 ± 9.0 Sm of CW-5.0h to
17.0 ± 5.0 Sm of CW-7.5 h. There is a slight increase to 24.0 ± 8.0 Sm1 for CW-10.0 h, but we judge this to be due to natural sample variations,
and we focus on the large difference compared to the CW-5.0h sample. Based onthese results and differently from other reported studies (24, 25), we found
that there is in fact an optimum delignification time. This is due to an
optimum lignin content resulting in an optimum level of sample integrity.
Accordingly, we selected 5.0h as the optimal delignification duration, and
the corresponding CW (CW-5.0h) was used for the fabrication of the WECT. The
WECT-Channel and WECT-Gate were made of CW-5.0h in sizes of 30 mm × 2 mm ×
1 mm (longitudinal × tangential × radial) and 30 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm
(longitudinal × tangential × radial), respectively. Although having a
bigger sheet area, the WECT-Gate has a lower conductivity (30.0 ± 4.0 Sm)
than the WECT-Channel (69.0 ± 9.0 Sm). This probably relates to the
poorer access of PEDOT:PSS to the interior parts of the larger wood piece,
which has a 2.5 times larger cross-section. One plausible reason for this is
that the initial PEDOT:PSS adsorption in the outer parts of the sample may
partially block PEDOT:PSS diffusion into the inner parts of the sample. Therecould also be a delignification gradient contributing in the same way, but webelieve this to be less plausible since the good permeability of the balsa
wood should ensure homogeneous delignification on the 1–radial mm scale.
However, we note there is a potential for improvement in future works, where
the effects of the samples’ geometry, the delignification gradient, and the
polymer infiltration gradient should be studied (26).
Fig. 2.

(A) The conductivity of CW samples fabricated using different delignificationtimes (Inset: four-point probe measurement setup). (B) Cyclic voltammetry of
the WECT-Channel and WECT-Gate samples. (C) Lignin content of Native and
DW-5.0h. (D) Illustration of the ionic conductivity measurement setup. (E andF) are the cross-sectional images of CW-Native and CW-5.0h samples,
respectively. (E, I) and (F, I) in turn are the cross-sectional SEM images
taken at the middle of supercritically point-dried CW-Native and CW-5.0h
samples. (E, II) and (E, III) are the EDX elemental mapping of oxygen and
sulfur in the corresponding SEM images of CW-Native. (F, II) and (F, III) arethe EDX elemental mapping of the oxygen and sulfur in the corresponding SEM
image of CW-5.0h. (G and H) are the SAXS patterns of DW-5.0h and CW-5.0h,
respectively. (I) The analyzing results of 1D SAXS spectra of DW-5.0h and
CW-5.0h (Inset: the calculated figures of DW-5.0h and CW-5.0h).

In addition to the electrical conductivity, the electrochemical properties
including charge storage capacitance and ionic conductivity are important forunderstanding the applicability of CW as active electrodes (Gate and Channel)in an OECT. While the device operates, the 3D structure of CW is expected to
facilitate a sufficient charge accumulation, which in turn will play a key
role in switching the current passing through the CW-based device channel
(14).

As shown in Fig. 2B, both the WECT-Gate and the WECT-Channel show good
capacitive behavior with their CV curves assuming a slightly deviated
rectangular shape. The deviation is most probably caused by the redox
activity of small amounts of native lignin, remaining in the DW (DW-5.0h),
and therefore also present in the CW-5.0h sample (10). The lignin content wasdetermined using the TAPPI T222 om-02 method and amounts to 7.1 ± 0.1 wt%
which is significantly lower than the 24.9 ± 0.1 wt% in the native wood
(Fig. 2C). Both the WECT-Gate and the WECT-Channel show good capacitances of
55.0 ± 5.0 mF and 31.0 ± 4.0 mF, respectively, at the scan rate of 20 mV/s
(see the specific capacitances in the SI Appendix). The higher capacitance ofWECT-Gate is a consequence of its larger size (2.5 times the volume of
WECT-Channel). For the operation of OECTs, it is advantageous if the gate
electrode has a larger capacitance than the transistor channel(26–28). As an
additional observation, we note that for other electrochemical devices
including supercapacitors, the capacitance results suggest the CW-5.0h as a
potentially useful material (10). Along with the electrodes’ capacitances,
the ionic conductivity of the WECT-Channel was also studied to understand itscapability for ion-mediated electrochemical conductivity regulation when an
external voltage is applied. By using the measurement setup shown in Fig. 2D,the recorded ionic resistance of the WECT-Channel (or CW-5.0h sample) is
lower than that of DW-5.0h. This implies that PEDOT:PSS has played an
important role in lowering the ionic resistance, which in turn means an
increase in the ionic conductivity within the CW scaffold. More detailed
results (SI Appendix, Fig. S3) and further discussion are presented in the SIAppendix.

Structural and morphological characterization was performed to map and
understand the wood’s morphology and PEDOT:PSS distribution and is presented
in Fig. 2 E and F. By comparing CW-5.0h with CW-Native, we observed a clear
distinction in their appearance and microstructure. As seen in Fig. 2 E and
F, where cross-sections from the middle of each sample are shown, CW-5.0h
appears dark blue throughout its thickness, while the cross-section of
CW-Native reveals its native light brown color. This indicates that PEDOT:PSShas penetrated the entire DW structure but was not able to access the inner
parts of the native (lignified) wood. Accordingly, at a microscopic scale as
investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), there is no trace of
PEDOT:PSS in the cross-section of CW-Native (Fig. 2 E, I and III). In
contrast, a PEDOT:PSS layer was seen in the fibers’ lumens (Fig. 2 F, I and
SI Appendix, Fig. S4) and vessels’ lumens (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) of the
CW-5.0h. This observation was further confirmed by Energy-dispersive X-ray
analysis (EDX) elemental mapping images, in which sulfur was mostly observed
in the wood lumen (Fig. 2 F, III). It should be noted that the PEDOT:PSS thinfilm in Fig. 2F was visualized by applying supercritical point drying insteadof air-drying (SI Appendix, Fig. S4) as the liquid CO2 causes detachment of
the polymer from the wood cell wall, making it clearly visible. In the
pristine samples used in WECTs, the PEDOT:PSS film only coats the inner
surface of the lumens (10), leaving the central section open for electrolyte
transport. A similar coating phenomenon is expected to happen at the ray
cells, contributing to transverse electrical transport and helping to create
3D electrical interconnection in the wood structure. With the observed
microstructure thus formed, conceptually illustrated in Fig. 1A, PEDOT:PSS isexpected to promote both the electron and ion transport through the 3D
structure of CW-5.0h and in the WECT-Channel.

In addition to the structure observed in SEM images, the small-angle X-ray
scattering (SAXS) measurements shown in Fig. 2 present another insight into
the distribution of PEDOT:PSS in the wood cell wall of CW-5.0h. The
two-dimensional SAXS patterns of DW-5.0h and CW-5.0h are presented in Fig. 2
G and H). Anisotropic streaks were observed, but they only show small
differences between the two samples. We further analyzed the one-dimensional
(1D) data (Fig. 2I) to determine the correlation length, which means the
center-to-center distance of the cellulose fibrils. Our calculation suggests
that CW-5.0h has a slightly larger correlation length (29) than that of
DW-5.0h (.0 ± 0.10 nm compared to .55 ± 0.15 nm) which could be an
indication of penetration of PEDOT:PSS polymer chains in between the CW-5.0h
wood fibers. A control measurement indicates that DMSO only has a minor
contribution to this effect (cf. SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Although we are
unable to quantify the amount of PEDOT:PSS inside the wood cell wall, this
result suggests that some of the polymer is localized there; however, the
amount should be small compared to the amount covering the cell wall. The
presence also has some effects on the wood fibers’ arrangement, which was
studied by wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and presented in SI Appendix,
Fig. S7. The CW-5.0h sample has a smaller Herman’s orientation factor of the
200 crystal plane compared to DW-5.0h, which means the alignment of cellulosefibrils is disturbed, probably as a result of the partial impregnation with
PEDOT:PSS. To further investigate the interaction between wood fibers and
PEDOT:PSS, ATR-FTIR measurements were carried out for both CW-5.0h and
DW-5.0h (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). The discussion on FTIR results (SI Appendix)
suggests that PEDOT:PSS has interactions with the wood fibers, which
facilitated the amalgamation of these components in the composite of CW-5.0h
(30–32).

Finally, mechanical properties (tensile strength and Young’s modulus) were
measured for native, delignified (DW-5.0h), and CW (CW-5.0h) and reveal that
the CW is similar in tensile strength and stiffness to the original balsa
wood (cf. SI Appendix, Fig. S9). Taking all the collected evidence of
electrical/electrochemical and structural properties into account, CW-5.0h
was selected as a good candidate for forming electrodes for the wood
transistor.

1.1. WECT.

OECTs can be constructed with a single gate electrode or with double gates oneither side of the transistor channel, as shown schematically in SI Appendix,Fig. S10 A and B, respectively. A double-gate configuration is beneficial
when the transistor channel dimensions are large since it provides better andfaster access for ion transport to all parts of the transistor channel. Here,for a WECT device with a 1-mm-thick channel, the double-gate structure would
thus be advantageous. This is experimentally proven by comparing the
switching performance of both configurations (cf. SI Appendix, Fig. S10 C andD). In view of this result, double-gate transistors were selected as the
standard configuration for further investigations.

As illustrated in Fig. 1B, a double-gate WECT is structured with the two gateelectrodes positioned on the top and bottom sides of the transistor channel.
Both the WECT-Gate electrodes and the WECT-Channel are made from 1-mm-thick
CW-5.0h. Although 1 mm is much thicker than the ordinary thickness of a
conventional PEDOT:PSS-based OECT [less than 1 μm (26, 27, 33)], still the
device operates like an ordinary p-type OECT. The current passing through theWECT-Channel is defined as the drain–source current (ID). At zero gate
voltage (VG), the transistor channel is open, and the transistor is ON,
whereas by applying a gate voltage of 6.0 V, the channel becomes fully
reduced, and the transistor is in the OFF state. Fig. 3B shows the transfer
curves of the device in which the ON/OFF [ID(VG = 0)/ID(VG = 6.0 V)] current
modulation reaches 1.7 orders of magnitude (50 times) for the forward sweep.
In comparison with the ON/OFF ratio (hundreds to 105) of conventional
PEDOT:PSS-based OECTs (14, 26, 33), the ratio of 50 is small but reasonable
for a transistor with a combination of high electrode thickness and limited
conductivity. In the same figure, it is observed that the transistor is
switched off when VG reaches .5 V. The switching process is repeatable,
which is shown in three consecutive switching runs presented in SI Appendix,
Fig. S11.
Fig. 3.

Wood electrochemical transistor (WECT). (A) The speculated operation
mechanism with a focus on part of a single wood fiber with the cell wall and
lumen, (B) the transfer curve, (C) the output curves at different gate
voltages, and (D) the dynamic switching characteristics at the frequency of
100 mHz. (Note: Each measurement was carried out on different devices.)
A tentative operation mechanism at a microscopic level of the WECT is
illustrated in Fig. 3A which is based on the switching performance and the
WECT-Channel’s morphology observed in Figs. 1C and 2. A section of one wood
fiber was selected to describe the working mechanism as it could represent
the current modulation principle in the entire WECT-Channel (10). Before
applying any potential to the gate electrodes (VG = 0 V), the WECT is in its
ON state. Upon applying VG > 0, the WECT is gradually switched to the OFF
state due to the electrolyte cations being driven out from the electrolyte
toward the wood cell wall surface where PEDOT:PSS is mainly localized and
held at negative potential. Here, an electrochemical reaction takes place
where the cations compensate the counter anions (PSS, and the PEDOT+ is
reduced to its nonconductive form PEDOT0 (15). As a result, the conductivity
of the WECT-Channel is decreased.

Output measurements are carried out to provide additional information about
the performance of WECTs. Here, the drain–source voltage (VD) was swept from
0 to .0 V, while VG was increased in steps from 0 to 6.0 V. In Fig. 3C,
the obtained ID–VD curves are shown. At VG = 0 V and VG = 1 V, we see that
ID increases linearly with increasing VD and reaches a plateau at around VD =.5 V. After that, ID undergoes a slight decrease when the VD level is
increased up to .0 V. The decrease is probably related to either a slight
reduction of PEDOT:PSS at such a high voltage range or a small current
leakage between the drain and the gate. In the output curves where VG is
stepped to values higher than .0 V, the transistor is in the OFF mode, and
such behavior is not observed. This is fully in agreement with the
characteristics of ordinary OECTs.

Although the WECT is expected to be slow, we also examined the dynamic
switching capability of the device. In dynamic switching measurements, a
function generator was sourcing VG as a square wave switching between 0 and
5.0 V at 100 mHz, while a constant VD of .0 V was applied. From the graph
shown in Fig. 3D, we see that repeated dynamic switching is fully possible,
although not fast. The main part of the OFF switching happens in around 1 s,
which has to be considered as good under the circumstances (a 1-mm-thick
transistor channel). The ON switching is slower and is not fully completed in5 s, which is probably the reason why we see a decreasing ON/OFF ratio as themeasurement in Fig. 3D progresses. For full ON/OFF dynamics, a lower
frequency than 100 mHz would have to be used. With these dynamic switching
properties, the WECT is not suitable for conventional electronic circuits butis probably an interesting candidate for wood-integrated applications rangingfrom electrochromic displays to simple logic circuits responding to sensor
input.

2. Conclusions

A transistor made of CW was successfully demonstrated. This result proves
that it is possible to modulate the electrical conductivity of the
electroactive wood by applying an external voltage. The WECT operates
according to the same principle as a double-gate OECT, where the two gates
and the transistor channel are made of delignified wood, made conductive (69
Sm) by the formation of a PEDOT:PSS layer in the lumina of the wood
structure, in particular the fiber lumina. The current modulation occurs
through electrochemical oxidation/reduction of PEDOT, with a measured ON/OFF
ratio of up to 50 times. Although the device performance is poorer than the
common PEDOT:PSS-based OECT, the WECT proves the principle and shows that
there is a possibility to transform wood into a functional transistor by
utilizing its oriented and hierarchical 3D structure, thereby introducing thepossibility to control and regulate the electronic current in CW. We also
believe there are possibilities for improvement by either optimizing the
conductivity of wood or manipulating the device configuration. Since the
mechanical stability of the transistor electrodes is as good as the original
balsa wood, strong and self-supporting devices could be readily constructed.
In view of the large interest in exploratory research concerning
bioelectronics, bio-based electronics, and plant electronics, this device andits working principle might be a stepping stone toward different applicationsin those fields.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials.

Balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) veneers with an oven-dried density of ~0.22 g cm3 were purchased from Material AB (Sweden). Sodium chlorite (NaClO2, 80%),
sodium chloride (NaCl, 99%), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99%) were receivedfrom Sigma Aldrich. PEDOT:PSS (Clevios PH1000, water suspension with %
solid content) was purchased from Heraeus, Germany. Carbon fibers, paraffin
wax, silver paste, and carbon paste were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and
used as received. Blue gel (250 g) was purchased from Cefar-Complex, Sweden.
3.2. Wood Delignification.

Balsa wood veneers were cut in the size of 30 mm × 10 mm × 1 mm
(longitudinal × tangential × radial). The veneers were delignified at 80 °
C in a NaClO2 (1.0 wt%) solution in acetate buffer for different reaction
times: 2.5 h, 5.0 h, 7.5 h, or 10.0 h. The obtained DW samples were
correspondingly named DW-2.5h, DW-5.0h, DW-7.5h, and DW-10.0h.
3.3. CW Preparation.

The DW samples were dried under an ambient atmosphere and cut into smaller
pieces. Samples with dimensions of 30 mm × 2 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal ×
tangential × radial) were used to prepare the CW-based transistor channel,
while samples having a dimension of 30 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal ×
tangential × radial) were used to prepare the CW–based gate of the WECT.
These DW pieces were thereafter impregnated in a PEDOT:PSS suspension (100 g
of PEDOT:PSS suspension mixed with 6 g of DMSO) before being oven-dried at 75°C to achieve the CW (see SI Appendix, Fig. S1 for a visual diagram). The
final CW products were obtained after mechanically removing all the
aggregated polymer layers on the surface of the dried samples. Corresponding
with the DWs, the obtained CWs were named CW-2.5h, CW-5.0h, CW-7.5h, and
CW-10.0h, respectively. The PEDOT:PSS-coated native wood (CW-Native) was
prepared in a similar approach, in which native wood was cut in a specific
size before being impregnated in the same PEDOT:PSS suspension to achieve theCW. All CWs used as the WECT-Channel and the WECT-Gate were dried and stored
in a controlled environment before being used for the device fabrication and
measurement.

3.4. WECT Fabrication.

The fabrication of a double-gate WECT is presented in Fig. 1B, where the two
gate electrodes are set perpendicularly to the channel electrode. One gate ison the top surface and the other one is placed under the bottom surface of
the transistor channel. The channel and gates are separated by a
cellulose-based tissue paper before dropping the electrolyte mixture on the
crossing area of the electrodes (Fig. 1B). The electrolyte is prepared by
mixing 2 mL blue gel (Blågel, Cefar-Complex) with 1 mL NaCl (1 M) and kept
for 2 weeks before use.

4. Characterization

4.1. Morphology and Chemical Composition.

SEM/EDX: The morphology of the wood samples was analyzed by field emission
SEM (Hitachi S-4800, Japan) at a low acceleration voltage of 1 kV. The
samples were microtomed, dried either in ambient conditions or under
supercritical CO2, and coated with a platinum/palladium conductive layer
using a sputter coater (Cressington 208HR, UK). EDX was performed at an
acceleration voltage of 6 kV with an Oxford Instruments, X-MAX N 80, UK.
Lignin and Monosaccharides Content: Klason lignin content was determined by
acid hydrolysis according to the TAPPI T222 om-02 method. The samples were
analyzed in duplicates. Quantification of the neutral sugars was performed onDionex ICS-3000 high-performance ion-exchange chromatography (Thermo Fisher
Scientific Inc.) after acid hydrolysis. The samples were analyzed in
duplicates, and anhydrous factors were used for the monosaccharides (0.88 forxylose and arabinose and 0.90 for glucose, mannose, and galactose). Meier’s
correlations were used to calculate the weight percentage of cellulose and
hemicellulose.

Leaching experiments were carried out for the WECT-Gate and WECT-Channel by
soaking the CW samples in deionized water for 4 d. The results indicate no
significant leaching and are presented in the Supporting Information (SI
Appendix, Fig. S12).

4.2. Conductivity Measurement.

The CW was glued on top of 4 chromium/gold electrodes by carbon paste, and
the resistance was measured using a 4-probe technique. A Keithley 2400 sourcemeter was used to supply the current to the two outer electrodes and to
measure the voltage between the two inner electrodes.
Based on the obtained resistance, the electrical conductivity (σ) of CW
samples is calculated using the following equation (10):
σ=1ρ=LRA,
[1]
where R is the obtained resistance, L is the distance between the two inner
electrodes, and A is the cross-sectional area of the specimen.
The sheet resistance of CW samples was calculated using the following
equation:
Rs=1σt,
[2]
where Rs is the sheet resistance, and t is the thickness of the sample.

4.3. Electrochemical Measurement.

The CW electrode for electrochemical measurement was prepared following the
same procedure as in our previous work. The CW is first connected to carbon
fibers using carbon paste before wrapping a part of the carbon fiber with
paraffin wax and Kapton tape, respectively. The electrochemical measurement
was performed in a three-electrode system configuration using a
potentiostat/galvanostat (by BioLogic, SP-200) coupled to a computer. The
capacitance of samples was calculated using the formula (34): C=1vΔV∫
V2V1idV=A2×k×ΔV
where i
is the charge/discharge current (A), A is the integral area of the CV curve,k is the scan rate (mV/s), and ΔV is the working potential of the discharge
process.

4.4. Wood OECT Characterization.

Transfer (drain current vs. gate voltage), output (drain current vs. drain
voltage), and dynamic switching (drain current vs. time) measurements were
conducted using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (HP/Agilent 4155B) and a
function generator (Agilent 33120 A).
4.5. SAXS and WAXS Measurements.

SAXS and WAXS measurements were performed on a point-collimated Anton Paar’s
SAXS point 2.0 system equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (wavelength
1.5418 Å and beam size of ~500 μm) and an Eiger R 1M detector with 75 × 75
μm pixel size (at RISE, Sweden). The sample-to-detector distance was set to
576 mm and 111 mm for SAXS and WAXS, respectively. The exposure time of each
measurement is 10 min, and they were performed at room temperature with a
beam path pressure of about 1 to 2 mbar. The data reduction was performed by
using SAXS analysis software (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria).
Please refer to the additional SAXS measurement, which was carried out at theCERMAV-CNRS (France), in the SI Appendix.

--

※ PTT 留言評論
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.228.64.147 (臺灣)
PTT 網址

superswide 05/01 00:51嗯嗯跟我想的一樣

Ayanami5566 05/01 00:51幹太扯 跟我想得一樣

xpsecret 05/01 00:51有點炫炮

dayend 05/01 00:51其實早有植物電燈 電器了喔 已上市

a94037501 05/01 00:51我只用真空管

dayend 05/01 00:52這資訊不是新聞了~

zz8826319 05/01 00:52真的跟我想的一樣

s81048112 05/01 00:52恩恩 了解了 厲害耶

Tattoo 05/01 00:53燒起來

sarsenwen 05/01 00:53嗯嗯跟我想差不多

tacojosh 05/01 00:53仔細想想真得是這樣

johnhmj 05/01 00:53等到台雞雞做出來再說好嗎?

abcd5566 05/01 00:53太屌了 可以用森林做大型處理器了

gremon131 05/01 00:54跟我有好的差不多

nges10310 05/01 00:54跟我夢到的一樣

King5566 05/01 00:54喔喔想不到我的理論居然被他們先完成了

SDFSDF 05/01 00:54拿來當功率元件 散熱差起火繼續供能

GGFACE 05/01 00:54有夠雞肋的發明==

chimeptt 05/01 00:54

CHEAT1069 05/01 00:55現在才知道喔 我小學在公園時就(ry

sorrywow 05/01 00:55所以你幾奈米

llgod 05/01 00:55跟植物肉原理差不多

cmcmisgod 05/01 00:55慘了比我早先發表

cccwahaha 05/01 00:55原本要走繼電器或降壓的可以直接走?

cccwahaha 05/01 00:55所以是讓設備成本降低的意思嗎

whiteegg 05/01 00:57喔 等到可以商業化量產了再叫我

gigu5498 05/01 00:58哇好酷

coolrgin 05/01 00:58哦哦我早知道了

Dinenger 05/01 00:58跟我想得差不多 被他搶先了

garcia 05/01 00:59終於可以手刻了 可喜可賀

fishouse 05/01 00:59我以前有想過 但當時太忙沒空做

ivorysoap 05/01 01:00嗯 跟我想的一樣 竟然實作出來了

shenmue1001 05/01 01:00可以量產的那一天記得叫我

ev331 05/01 01:01我理盲 講人話

GoodmanYY 05/01 01:02不能量產有屁用

STAV72 05/01 01:03簡單來說是把木材用藥劑洗過再鍍上邏輯閘

g70245 05/01 01:03滿酷的

good5755 05/01 01:03大小?用木板做感覺體積就很大

good5755 05/01 01:03真空管:當我死人?

mirac1e 05/01 01:04開關要五秒鐘 這根本跟垃圾沒兩樣

mirac1e 05/01 01:04而且木材根本是絕緣體 doping也沒用

mirac1e 05/01 01:04做這種東西根本浪費時間 笑死

XXXaBg 05/01 01:06感覺有點酷

andy199113 05/01 01:07火燒起來就完了

Melmetal 05/01 01:07想不到有什麼優點….

chanel1259 05/01 01:08從小我媽說我是木頭,看來要出頭了

sa511394 05/01 01:10過熱會燒起來嗎

SulaA 05/01 01:11成本 體積

EFERO 05/01 01:13滿地的矽不用 特地去砍樹來做???

astrophy 05/01 01:14目前看不到有什麼潛力,先完善碳基電晶

hinajian 05/01 01:14所以傳統半導體的開關是幾秒?(奈秒?)

astrophy 05/01 01:14體比較要緊

wupeter09 05/01 01:14這是能有什麼優點 除了弄個論文以外

RaiGend0519 05/01 01:15都要塞填充物了,代表可以用木頭以

RaiGend0519 05/01 01:15外的玩意做載體

abasqoo 05/01 01:20講人話

vow70 05/01 01:21能量產商用再說,以前也一堆技術號稱多強啊

a36991069 05/01 01:22還在實驗室而已 能量產再說

yas73528 05/01 01:24我就說吧 木頭不是只有拿來生火而已

ikenaka 05/01 01:24嗯嗯 跟我想的差不多

JJJZZs 05/01 01:24效能/價格沒比較好就是玩具而已

molsmopuim 05/01 01:26http://i.imgur.com/bUfrB4C.jpg

MaBumblerQQ 05/01 01:27哦哦還OK啦

tactics2100 05/01 01:30適合拿來聽古典樂嗎?

tactics2100 05/01 01:31會不會出木頭管擴大機?

newyanew 05/01 01:34好險我國中英文還不錯 這篇文章內容跟

newyanew 05/01 01:35我想的差不多

user048288ef 05/01 01:35快推,我看的懂

danielpupu20 05/01 01:35台積電大利空

danielpupu20 05/01 01:35台積電大利空

greenpeter 05/01 01:36台積電要派出專利戰隊出來了嗎

twmacaron 05/01 01:37產矽的新竹要變沙漠了

snow0214 05/01 01:38不能讓別人知道我不懂 先點頭再說

sunnyyoung 05/01 01:41一二三 木頭人

sawe53 05/01 01:42可惜我忘記申請專利了

Lionvjm95 05/01 01:45嗯嗯 幫我把我想說的打成文章 辛苦了

robinnibor 05/01 01:45三小。一堆英文

alex00089 05/01 01:49PPLS?

st2913sbck 05/01 01:51石紀元?

immosha 05/01 01:56應該要拿其他不助燃的東西試試

alex00089 05/01 01:56其實跟木頭一點關係都沒有

kurtsgm 05/01 01:56滿酷的 但99.99%是無用的研究

whathefuc 05/01 01:57呃…有啥應用?

ufo15526368 05/01 01:59剛看完,覺得還好而已

RiverMan1 05/01 02:01剛看完,覺得還好而已

wayhowhown 05/01 02:14我小學上廁所時就想到了

foxher 05/01 02:35這算鬧板了吧?那麼長的英文給誰看

kayak5566 05/01 02:39誇張 當耗材玩也不是這樣

outzumin 05/01 02:39有機半導體20年前就紅過了 換個噱頭?

c24253994 05/01 02:41整座森林都是我的處理器,真棒

wei09955104 05/01 02:43新世紀打火石

imhan705 05/01 02:52有啥優點嗎

z635066 05/01 03:03在微管束中塞導電塑料算木頭材質?

selfhu 05/01 03:06需要砍樹嗎?

tony890415 05/01 03:13S.S多少

kai2573 05/01 03:14樹有比矽多嗎

wayne121212 05/01 03:17看起來只是拿木頭當骨架而已,核心

wayne121212 05/01 03:17還是普通的OFET啊

wayne121212 05/01 03:18哪有什麼革命性的變革

EugeneSue 05/01 03:36有什麼屌用

zerothomas8 05/01 03:39先看看可以活多久

EfiwymsiAros 05/01 04:00嗯嗯跟我想的 靠北一堆英文是殺小

smallpig02 05/01 04:32還好而已

ting0509 05/01 04:43環保材質可以賣更貴 而且保固一到一定壞

ting0509 05/01 04:43xD

gunfighter 05/01 04:53飛機敢用嗎

herculus6502 05/01 04:55矽基變碳基,便宜

ee8iqp7x 05/01 05:23複製.pdf的paper段落跑掉,改好再貼吧

fir191938 05/01 05:25剛看完 還好而已

GyroZep 05/01 05:32菸黨:嗯又可以圈錢了

ideal5566 05/01 05:35感覺很像假的

RanceTsai 05/01 05:54太長

icespring 05/01 05:55嗯嗯 跟我想的一樣

hsupohsiang 05/01 05:59I am Groot.

ryan0222 05/01 06:03https://youtu.be/Gr1XzISc6JQ

ryan0222 05/01 06:03就跟紙火鍋一樣,耍噱頭,嚐鮮有趣爽一次

ryan0222 05/01 06:03就可以了

InvincibleK 05/01 06:15沒屁用,用這個會被35主管當成神經病

esp0122 05/01 06:16嗯嗯 我就說吧

aburabbit 05/01 06:18熱起來,錫都會脫焊了,木頭不會燒起

aburabbit 05/01 06:18來嗎= =

b7278622 05/01 06:27Silicon還是屌打啦 環保價值就不好說了

c88tm 05/01 06:28抽象的?

organ63521 05/01 06:46我早就知道了,只是我不想紅而已

gamesame7711 05/01 06:48結果發現奈米碳管辦到了

Mesa5566 05/01 06:50喔 所以螞蟻吃嗎?

kentyeh 05/01 06:51以後晶片用種的?

Freeven 05/01 07:02好屌

mdkn35 05/01 07:11你貼這麼多誰看得懂啊

Dean997 05/01 07:23沒錯,我也是這麼認為

newlie 05/01 07:24結論是不是應該寫:整個地球是一個晶體腦?

newlie 05/01 07:25因為所有物品都能傳輸電子,樹木泥土水...

picass0607 05/01 08:32我晚上才夢到

iamhemry 05/01 08:37和我想的差不多

enskyzuso 05/01 08:42這篇我居然有一點點看得懂

d38485678 05/01 08:45看不懂啦

panda816 05/01 09:35好的 跟朕所想的一樣

Wenerrix 05/01 09:37我完全看不懂,噓

neglect 05/01 09:38推一下,晚點看

Jazz9 05/01 09:39嗯, 沒錯, 那你怎麼看?

rancilio 05/01 09:54以後晶圓可以用種出來嗎?

Addidas 05/01 10:08成本靠北貴吧 不能用仿木材料或鍍膜就好?

cosmo7897 05/01 10:37文章這樣貼 那大家都來隨便找paper貼

cosmo7897 05/01 10:37一貼洗貼文

Mood10207 05/01 10:38推專業

z900215ro 05/01 10:45洗p幣啊?

xixixxiixxii 05/01 10:50還不是靠填充的塑膠

f26724309 05/01 10:52劣退

z19880215 05/01 11:30還好而已

jason4571 05/01 11:34跟我國小想的差不多

isolove19 05/01 12:57跟我想的一樣

kenlin0105 05/01 13:01嗯嗯 跟我想的一樣

ThomasTFS80 05/01 14:05真×電木

cp296633 05/01 14:54現在去當木工學徒還來得及嗎

bigtien6292 05/01 16:03這樣貼誰會看 亂發一通

CrazyBug 05/01 17:40關閉要一秒鐘沒什麼實用價值吧

tozz 05/01 17:42隨便複製貼上就可以洗文章了484

shenyi9185 05/01 18:471秒延遲…5秒斷電…拿來當電燈開關都

shenyi9185 05/01 18:47被嫌到爆

octopuso1c 05/01 19:07林業起飛XD

r98192 05/01 22:09嗯嗯 果然跟我想的差不多

Juder 05/01 23:27瓦屋

hank850503 05/02 02:50這跟我想的一樣 可惡

windwater14 05/02 08:51直接貼paper?就是有機半導體運用,

windwater14 05/02 08:51二十年前是玩2D長成3D,這篇是給3D

windwater14 05/02 08:51立體框架去填導電部分,而且還是用P

windwater14 05/02 08:51EDOT:PSS這萬用導電高分子材料。