Re: [爆卦] 拜登口頭將台灣提升為北約等級盟友

我英文真的很差，請問這句話意思是什麼

why wouldn't China say that? Look, George, the idea that w-- there's a fundamental difference between-- between Taiwan, South Korea, NATO.

是台灣、南韓跟北約間存有根本的差異

或是

這種情況，跟台灣、南韓跟北約間存有根本的差異？

※ 引述《Fw200 (小松坡戰鬥群)》之銘言：
: ※註:有電視或媒體有報導者，請勿使用爆卦!，切勿用爆卦張貼新聞
: 無重大八卦請勿使用此分類，否則視同濫用爆卦鬧板(文章退回、水桶6個月)
: 未滿30繁體中文字 水桶3個月
: 如題
: 昨天拜登接受ABC新聞專訪
: 再針對阿富汗落翅議題上。
: 訪問人：總統先生，你提到我們的對手，中國與俄羅斯，你已然看到中國對台灣說：「看: 吧，就跟你說靠美國是沒有用的啦」（笑）
: 拜登：中國說這種話並不意外，你看，台灣、韓國與北約的情形完全不同，在那座島上與: 韓國，沒有內戰與且有統一的政府，試圖不讓壞人對她們做壞事。
: 我們信守一切承諾，我們對北大西洋公約組織第五條做出神聖保證，要是有人膽敢對我們: 的北約盟友做出動作，日本、韓國、台灣都一樣，我們保證會做出回應，這根阿富汗根本: 不能相提並論。
: https://reurl.cc/Gm8Zox
: （ｏ＿Ｏ）
: 如果不是失智，那美國總統公開做出這承諾，實屬十分罕見，且......重大。北約耶....: ..
: （◎ー◎；）
: 補個原文節錄：
: STEPHANOPOULOS: You talked about our adversaries, China and Russia. You alread: y see China telling Taiwan, "See? You can't count on the Americans." (LAUGH): BIDEN: Sh-- why wouldn't China say that? Look, George, the idea that w-- there: 's a fundamental difference between-- between Taiwan, South Korea, NATO. We ar: e in a situation where they are in-- entities we've made agreements with based: on not a civil war they're having on that island or in South Korea, but on an: agreement where they have a unity government that, in fact, is trying to keep: bad guys from doin' bad things to them.
: We have made-- kept every commitment. We made a sacred commitment to Article F: ive that if in fact anyone were to invade or take action against our NATO alli: es, we would respond. Same with Japan, same with South Korea, same with-- Taiw: an. It's not even comparable to talk about that.

-----
Sent from JPTT on my Xiaomi MI 9.

--