Re: [討論] 焦糖：BNT沒有兒童疫苗是輝瑞才對

antpro 發表於 2022/4/29 下午6:50:44

看板HatePolitics標題Re: [討論] 焦糖：BNT沒有兒童疫苗是輝瑞才對作者

(-_*|| 宅)時間Apr 29 18:50:44 2022推噓 4 推:5 噓:1 →:1

※ 引述《kuninaka ()》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《omanorboyo (omanorboyo)》之銘言：
: : https://i.imgur.com/PMyGSKy.png

: → antpro: 一間德國公司；一間美國公司；我以為，這是常識。 04/29 18:31
: → antpro: 某樓，日本只叫 Pfizer。標籤上面也只有Pfizer 喔 04/29 18:38: → antpro: 非 Pfizer 銷售區域，標籤才是 BioNTech。 04/29 18:39: → antpro: 當然，前陣子還有上海復星以為賣得進中國的中文標籤 04/29 18:39: 英派焦糖陳嘉航
: 是不是在下很大的一盤棋？
: 美國CDC的文章，就清楚的寫出BNT公司的名字
: 還是這時候美國CDC又不可信了
: https://reurl.cc/WrXbmy
: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (5 Through 11 Years of Age)
: Pfizer materials have been updated to include the updated Interim Clinical
: Considerations for the Use of COVID-19 Vaccines Currently Authorized in the: United States posted on November 3, 2021. This includes new materials for the: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine formulations for ages 5 through 11 years of: age.

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I think it's a name of a vaccine. I am not sure if it's canonical or not.
Please note here: I said two companies.
One is American company and the other is German company.

Regarding the label, you can google it by "Google Image".
Main points here:
1. I said two companies.
2. I didn't mention they are separate vaccines.
3. I said the labels are different.

If you don't know what I said in Chinese or English.
The only way is I use Japanese to explain; but I don't think you know Japanese.

Best regards

※ PTT 留言評論

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.97.14.130 (日本)

※ PTT 網址

推

q34704/29 18:52OK Japan=A片

推

kuninaka04/29 18:55→ antpro: 兒童疫苗，就沒BNT的份兒。

→

kuninaka04/29 18:55 04/29 18:43

我這裡提到兒童疫苗並不是說標籤的事情。我是想表達，兒童疫苗是 Pfizer 在賣的。這中英文新聞一堆，不用我解釋。再者，你整個推文看下來，可以發現我原本要回的就是這是兩家公司。另外，焦不焦糖，不關我屁事，我不是臺灣天龍國人，我對他也沒有投票權。