PTT評價

[黑特] 英國高等法院:FOIA不適用蔡英文論文

看板HatePolitics標題[黑特] 英國高等法院:FOIA不適用蔡英文論文作者
Pietro
(特務P修正將地面層及地下)
時間推噓 3 推:6 噓:3 →:9

資訊來自Richardson的部落格

https://richardsonreports.wordpress.com/2022/10/19/upper-tribunal-judge-edward-jacobs-rules-tsai-ing-wen-thesis-controversy-cannot-be-resolved-by-freedom-of-information-law/

英國Upper Tribunal的法官Edward Jacobs駁回一項引用FOIA(資訊自由法)來討論。

判決認定FOIA並不適用此案件。

文中還有提到:

President Tsai’s name is on the contemporaneous pass list for in 1984 and the title of her thesis was published
in 1985. The University had confirmed that there was an oral examination and
that it holds records of that examination. The tribunal decided that this was sufficient to satisfy the legitimate interests of [Appellant].”


‘’蔡總統的名字有出現在1984年的通過名單,其論文標題有出現在1985年的出版物上。
大學已經確認有口試,也證實他們持有口試紀錄。
本庭認為這些已足以滿足上訴人的法益。



“The request was made to the University of London. The important word there is ‘University’. The request was not made to any of the constituent colleges ofthe University and did not relate to information held by any of the colleges. In particular, the duty did not apply to
the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), which was
the relevant college.”


這邊則是澄清LSE沒有責任回應這項針對倫敦大學的要求。


文章還有提到為何FOIA不適用此案件。

總之上訴庭再度確認倫敦大學持有口試資料喔呵呵。

彭P剛募款五百萬要告LSE的樣子?
※ 每日發文數上限為5篇,自刪與板主刪除,同樣計入額度 ※
※ 發文 內文請滿40字 ※
------以上看完可使用 Ctrl+y 刪除------

-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-A217F.

--

※ PTT 留言評論
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.216.89.173 (臺灣)
PTT 網址

Hohenzollern10/20 08:54下個月彭文正他們一樣說取得重大突破

chrisjohn21410/20 08:54畢業三十年學校都沒論文,哈哈哈哈

“The tribunal found that, although the theses may not have been provided to the libraries rather than lost or misfiled, that did not undermine the accuracy of the information about the degree awarded. That was a matter of judgment. I can see no error of law in the conclusion or in the way it was made.ꠊ 英國高等法院確認,論文有無妥善收入圖書館這點,不影響該學位的正式授予。

madduxH10/20 08:55對台灣法律來說美國跟賭神裡公海算不算同樣的領域?

apple12377310/20 08:58啥? 精神時光屋有那麼久喔

chrisjohn21410/20 08:58笑死人,全世界還有哪個博士畢業了三十年學校都沒

chrisjohn21410/20 08:58她的論文的啊,就這種智商,難怪菸粉會打高端XD

camp010210/20 08:58文正文哲白粉又輸了 怎麼說又

lazycat510/20 08:59重大突破=騙到好多錢

CavendishJr10/20 09:01不愧是說武漢沒病毒的,英國法院認證的也不信

benothing10/20 09:074%準備好斗內了嗎

whitezealman10/20 09:09蔣萬安:會支持韓國瑜的,都是比較不理性的

miler2202010/20 09:102樓可以捐一下

※ 編輯: Pietro (49.216.89.173 臺灣), 10/20/2022 09:35:45

foolfighter10/20 10:40白痴比魯

waynecode10/20 12:15那就繼續上訴吧,不適用資訊自由法就也太主觀

waynecode10/20 12:16有編目卻沒入館,鬼才相信有這篇論文存在

Pietro10/20 14:51first tier tribunal information rights 已經確認口試資

Pietro10/20 14:51料的存在了

suyusian10/20 14:56拖台爛戲可以募到500萬,盤子真的是很多,彭P的財富密碼