Re: [新聞] 蔡英文論文門重大進展？LSE秘藏檔案擬公

綠共蟑螂現在唯一的浮木

就是一直洗LSE「官方聲明」認證蔡英文的博士身份

在此澄清

這個網站並非由官方發布。 也就是LSE從未為蔡英文的博士學歷背書
認證。

關於該網站對蔡的聲明來自第三者提供，是無效的。

這就是官網的那個位置https://www.lse.ac.uk/lse-information/Terms-of-use

這個網站的使用條款
lse-information - Terms-of-use

2.2 LSE gives no warranty or assurance about the content of the Website. As theWebsite is under constant development its contents may be incorrect or out-of-date and are subject to change without notice. While LSE makes every effort to ensure that the content of the Website is accurate, LSE cannot accept liability fo r the accuracy of all content at any given point in time.

2.2 簡單講： LSE對本網站的內容不提供任何擔保或保證。

2.7 We are a distributor (and not a publisher) of content supplied by third parties and users of the internet. Any opinions, advice, statements, services, offers, or other information or content expressed or made available by third parties , including information providers, or users, are those of the authors or distrib utors and not of us. We do not necessarily endorse nor are we responsible forthe accuracy or reliability of any opinion, advice or statement made on the Website.

2.7 我們是由協力廠商和互聯網使用者提供的內容的發行者（而非發行者）。任何由協力廠商（包括資訊提供者或使用者）表達或提供的意見，建議，聲明，服務，優惠或其他資訊或內容，都是作者或發行者的意見，而不是我們的意見或建議。我們不一定認可也不對網站上的任何意見，建議或聲明的準確性或可靠性負責。 （所以LSE網站上對蔡的聲明並不是LSE官方的認證，因為2.7條清楚說明並非來自LSE）

2.8 The information on the Website is not intended to address your particular requirements. Such information does not constitute any form of advice or recommen dation by us and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraini ng from making) any specific educational, or other, decisions. 2.8 The information on the Website is not intended to address your particular r
equirements. Such information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by us and is not intended to be relied upon by you in making (or refraining from making) any specific educational, or other, decisions. You should take your own advice and/ or make specific enquiries and independently verify any information before relying upon it.

2.8 在讀者依仗官網的信息前，應該先自己思考，或做特別查詢，並自主去驗證這些信息。

（簡單講，LSE 告訴你，LSE這個網站的信息是沒有經過驗證的，要驗證是你自己的事）。

總結

連這個網站的使用者聲明都警告讀者要自己查證，官方也切割得那麼清楚

這就是蟑螂一直洗「官方認證」的公關稿罷了

到底花了人民多少納稅金
--

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 110.30.40.193 (臺灣)

https://www.ptt.cc/Gossiping/M.1616740794.A.E55

※ 編輯: tontontonni (110.30.40.193 臺灣), 03/26/2021 14:42:01

※ 編輯: tontontonni (110.30.40.193 臺灣), 03/26/2021 15:00:03