Re: [新聞] 美國3學者:賴清德應考慮凍結台獨黨綱
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/taiwan/taiwan-china-true-sources-deterrence
原文寫的又臭又長
這邊幫大家節錄跟台灣總統大選比較相關的段落
“Regardless of who is elected Taiwan’s next president, Taipei will need to convincingly reassure Beijing that it has no intention of fundamentally altering the status quo. But the need for such guarantees will grow in the event of the victory of Lai, the DPP candidate; Chinese officials deeply mistrust him since he has endorsed the pursuit of formal independence for Taiwan in the past.”
“The pledge that Lai made, in an October 2023 speech in Taipei at a dinner attended by nearly 100 foreign dignitaries and guests, to maintain Tsai’s cross-strait policy, with its emphasis on refusing both to bow to Chinese pressure and to provoke Beijing, is a good start. If elected, Lai could use his inaugural address to reaffirm the commitments Tsai made in her inaugural speech in 2016 to conduct cross-strait affairs in accordance with the Republic of China’s constitution and the 1992 act governing relations between the two sides of the strait, Taipei’s law on how the island should manage relations with Beijing.”
“In August, Lai took a step in the right direction when he made his stance on the naming question clear: “President Tsai has used the term Republic of China (Taiwan) to describe our country. I will continue to do so in the future.” Thisand other statements provide China with rhetorical assurance, but because his party’s 1991 charter still calls for the creation of a “Republic of Taiwan” and a new constitution, doubts persist in Beijing about his willingness to hold tothis position as president. If he wins the election, Lai should consider revisiting a proposal made by DPP legislators in 2014 to suspend the independence clause in the 1991 party charter, a nonbinding and reversible step that would give any rhetorical commitment to the status quo more weight and credibility. Such a step could also be part of a gradual, reciprocal process to reduce tensions and build trust, as advocated by Richard Bush, the former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan.”
“Taiwan has laudably begun to strengthen its defenses under Tsai, but her administration has also tactfully refrained from pushing pro-independence initiatives. That marks a departure from her DPP predecessor as president, Chen Shui-bian,who held a referendum in 2008 on pursuing membership in the United Nations under the name Taiwan, rather than the Republic of China, which was rightly interpreted by both Beijing and Washington as a ploy to promote independence.”
這篇文章其實主要在講美國在兩岸的角色應該是一個credible assurance 而不是對中國的military threat
然後台灣總統是誰其實不重要 只要繼續走目前的ROC路線就好
--
文章有不少篇幅講到美國應該清楚表態
會接受兩岸和平協商出的任何結果
這兩年冒出一堆美國學者說炸毀台積電的
15
[情報] WBSC官網 中職新會長報導剛剛看到WBSC官網也PO了相關報導 ague-boost-chinese-taipei-team-for-tokyo-olympic-qualifier 就來大略的翻一下 但本人不是專業的,所以如果有翻錯,敬請告知8
Re: [問卦] 拜登:不支持台獨八卦就是拜登沒有說"不支持台獨" 這句話根本是央視超譯了 白宮發表的拜習會聲明在這兒 講到台灣的部分在倒數第二段最後一行 "On Taiwan, President Biden underscored that the United States remains11
Re: [爆卦] 蔡英文想要和習近平進行和平會談CNN 46分鐘前釋出的新聞: Taiwan's President says the threat from China is increasing 'every day' and confirms presence of US troops on the island 台灣總統說來自中國的威脅逐日上升11
Re: [新聞] 美國3學者:賴清德應考慮凍結台獨黨綱這一篇文章 Taiwan and the True Sources of Deterrence Why America Must Reassure, Not Just Threaten, China By10
Re: [新聞] 國防部:一年役期的義務役男 主要分發守老美表態了。速度那麼快,看來事先溝通過: 「「我們歡迎台灣最近針對徵兵制改革的宣布。此宣布彰顯了台灣對自我防衛的承諾並強化嚇阻能力。我們遵循台灣關係法與一個中國政策的承諾,持續協助台灣維持足夠的自我防禦能力。美國對台灣的承諾,以及台灣為強化自我防衛能力所採取的步驟,有助於維持台灣海峽與區域的和平與穩定。美國持續支持兩岸問題以和平方式解決,且反對海峽兩岸任何一方改變現狀。」-- 美國在台協會發言人 “We welcome Taiwan’s recent announcement on conscription reform, which underscores Taiwan’s commitment to self-defense and strengthens deterrence. We will continue to assist Taiwan in maintaining a sufficient self-defense capability in line with our commitments under the Taiwan Relations Act and our one China policy. The United States’ commitment to Taiwan and steps Taiwan takes to enhance its self-defense capabilities contribute to the maintenance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and within the region. The United States will continue to support a peaceful resolution of cross-Strait issues, and oppose any unilateral changes in the status quo by either side.” – AIT Spokesperson」 -----5
Re: [新聞] 蔡英文雷根圖書館演講傳取消 總統府這個活動根本就是大成功 為什麼負責的人員要懲處? 阿 你應該是說中國的外交官要懲處 因為他們竟然讓眾議員院長 直接說出了 Taiwan PresidentX
Re: [黑特] 馬英九又砸鍋了先說結論,原po認知是錯誤的,馬英九是對的,即,美國不會居中做任何調停角色。 眾所周知,美國處理台灣問題就是兩個:台灣關係法和六項保證。 其中:六項保證中明訂: (2016年版本)2,美國並不尋求為台灣與中華人民共和國之間作調停﹔ (We see no mediation role for the United States between Taiwan and the PRC)
18
[討論] 所以藍白不支持棒球原因 真的這麼狹隘喔34
Re: [轉錄] 台灣民眾黨-fb39
[討論] 蔣萬安怎麼能蹭到翻車?29
[轉錄] 羅智強FB 請大家為陳芳盈集氣31
[討論] 台灣尚勇真的蠻洗腦的。26
Re: [討論]中國多人競賽世界排名都很低19
[討論] 民眾黨和蔣萬安是隨便亂蹭嗎?21
[討論] Chinese Taipei 隊伍沒有台北人!19
[討論] 郭國文和蔣萬安誰比較失禮?17
[討論] 蕭美琴怎麼可以那麼低調29
[討論] 本屆政治人物亂蹭排行榜?14
[討論] 所以到底是誰在崩潰?16
[討論] 陳啟昱當庭逮捕、聲押禁見3X
[討論] 賴清德根本不愛棒球14
[黑特] 館長談到棒球怎躲躲閃閃?36
[討論] 2008年是不是台灣最慘的一年12
[討論] 蔣萬安有比馬狗還廢嗎11
[討論] 蔣萬安怎麼蹭棒球蹭成這副德性?28
[討論] 藍白粉是不是人格扭曲呀9
[討論] 賴成立全民運動署,暫擱新住民署!做對27
[討論]中國多人競賽世界排名都很低9
[討論] 為何藍營民代蹭棒球卻有點格格不入17
Re: [討論] 業者爆料:清水洗不乾淨太陽能版10
[討論] 中天記者造反 問民眾看到台灣國旗感動嗎8
[討論] 只問一句,藍白粉要回馬時代嗎?6
[黑特] 賤草崩潰一整天了,要崩到頭七嗎?9
Re: [討論] 今天藍白更崩潰 演不下去了5
[舊聞] 潘孟安遭質疑搞「25億全台最貴棒球場」2
[討論] 要出多大的事情才會讓民進黨再起不能?5
Re: [討論]中國多人競賽世界排名都很低