Re: [新聞] 特斯拉新款 Model S Plaid 爆首次起火意

※ 引述《FAPP (手槍俠)》之銘言
: 特斯拉新款 Model S Plaid 爆首次起火意外，整車燒成廢鐵
: 原文連結：
: https://applealmond.com/posts/105703
: 原文內容：
: 國外媒體報導，於美國時間 6 月 29 日晚間，一輛新款的特斯拉 Model S Plaid 在
美國費
: 城郊區發生起火意外，這場 Model S Plaid 的起火意外，目前得知無人傷亡，當地消防局
: 也正在調查起火主因。但就目擊證人的說法，這輛 Model S Plaid 是無緣無故自己起火燃
: 燒的。
: 這場 Model S Plaid 的起火意外，發生在美國時間 6 月 29 日晚間 9 點左右，當地消防
: 局接獲民眾報案後，迅速抵達現場灑水救火，因為在今年 4 月中的特斯拉車禍意外滅火經
: 驗，此次消防人員在對付電動車火勢時，非常迅速就將火勢撲滅，透過兩組水線灑水
降溫，
: 灑水將近一個半小時，冷卻電池直到火勢完全撲滅。
: 火勢撲滅後，消防員檢查事故現場，事故車輛幾乎完全燒成廢鐵，只剩下一些焦黑的
車體殘
: 骸，從車輛焦黑的殘骸與輪框來看，起火的正式一輛幾週前才交車的新款特斯拉 Mod
el S P
: laid，所幸這場事故沒有造成任何人員傷亡，但目前消防人員都還聯繫不到這輛 Mod
el S P
: laid 的車主。
: 目前當地消防局還正在調查起火主因，但一名急救人員在 Reddit 上發文表示，報警
的是一
: 位當地一位的社區居民，這位居民表示看到 Model S Plaid 車上無人，並突然起火，然後
: 在他家門前爆炸，但因為至今還聯繫不上 Model S Plaid 的車主，所以還沒辦法完整釐清
: 這場事故的主因。
: 馬斯克曾表示，新款 Model S Plaid 之前會延遲交車，主要就是因為要確保電池模組的安
: 全性，雖然目前尚無法確認真正的起火主因是什麼，當然也無法排除可能是人為意外
，但如
: 果調查結果為電池意外造成，想必對馬斯克來說是一件非常尷尬的事情，只能期待特
斯拉在
: 整車安全性的部分可以越做越好，盡量減少此類意外的發生，雖然電動車的起火速度
低於汽
: 油車，但是因為擁有電池組的化學物質，還是一樣不能輕視意外的發生。
: 心得/說明：(30字以上)
: 才剛上市的車款
: 就發生了起火事故
: 雖然不知道是自燃還是人為縱火
: 但還是為Tesla的安全性蒙上一層陰影

已經兩天了還沒人po

https://cleantechnica.com/2021/07/04/more-details-about-tesla-model-s-plaid-
fire-lead-to-more-questions/

More Details About Tesla Model S Plaid Fire Lead To More Questions
ByJohnna Crider
Published 2 days ago
There have been more details released about the recent Tesla Model S Plaid f
ire, including who owned the vehicle. The information released has led to ev
en more questions. Although I believe we should wait on the results of the i
nvestigation, there are some questions that a few Tesla owners and sharehold
ers have taken to Twitter to pose. Before getting into that, here is the lat
est that we have so far:

CNBC reported that when the vehicle caught on fire, the owner was actually b
ehind the wheel. The article included a statement from the owner’s attorney
s and noted that the owner’s identity isn’t being disclosed. The article a
lso stated that a spokesperson for the National Highway Traffic Safety Admin
istration said they were aware and in touch with the relevant agencies and T
esla. “If data or investigations show a defect or an inherent risk to safet
y exists, NHTSA will take action as appropriate to protect the public,” the
spokesperson told CNBC.

Reuters reported that the owner of the Plaid Model S was an “executive entr
epreneur” and that he wasn’t able to get out of the car. The electronic do
or system failed and the owner had to use force to push it open, according t
o the attorneys.

Mark Geragos, of Geragos & Geragos, the law firm representing the owner, tol
d Reuters, “It was a harrowing and horrifying experience.” He added, “Thi
s is a brand new model. … We are doing an investigation. We are calling for
the S Plaid to be grounded, not to be on the road until we get to the botto
m of this.”

Bloomberg reported that the owner of the Model S Plaid is Bart Smith, who is
the head of the digital asset group as Susquehanna International. Bloomberg
stated that Smith’s firm owned around $1.1 billion worth of Tesla shares a
s of March 31. Things get a bit interesting here, though. @WholeMarsBlog sha
red on Twitter that there was a possibility that the global quant trading fi
rm, which does trade Tesla’s stock, could hedge a short

Kristen (K10) shared some more information from Investopedia about Susquehan
na Securities. Investopedia noted that the firm owned 60.7 million Tesla sha
res in 2019 and that it also owned 64.6 million put options and 54.3 call op
tions of Tesla.

The fact that the firm has had put options on Tesla [NASDAQ:TSLA] has made q
uite a few supporters suspicious. And considering past events where short se
llers have tried to sabotage Tesla in various ways in the past, I don’t bla
me them. Personally, I believe that truth always prevails and the truth will
come out. This could just be a coincidence, and I’m sure that investigator
s are looking into it.

Again, we’re not making any claims of wrongdoing, but it’s an interesting
edge of this case that seems worth keeping an eye on

While many were freaking out over the headlines regarding the Houston Tesla
crash earlier this year that led to two men dying, the truth eventually prev
ailed. Constable Herman, who was investigating the Houston crash, declared t
hat he was 100% sure that there was no one in the driver’s seat of that Mod
el S and many media outlets took the story and ran. However, it was later fo
und that the constable’s office was already in possession of video evidence
that directly contradicted his claims. It was later found that there was a
driver and that the constable was spreading some misinformation. The truth p
revailed in this case and I believe it will also prevail here.

Although it does seem odd that the head of a firm that has had put options o
n Tesla’s stock in the past was involved in a fiery crash involving Tesla’
s newest vehicle, the Model S Plaid, it’s also odd that this incident happe
ned just before Tesla’s announcement of its record-breaking delivery number
s. However, this could be 100% a coincidence

I think that we all should keep open minds about this investigation.

I also think that we should keep in mind that Smith just lost his vehicle an
d the Model S Plaid is stunning. To lose it in such a horrific accident is n
ot only sad but scary. Smith also nearly lost his life according to the repo
rts, in nearly the same manner that my mother and I did when I was a child.
Our car exploded and we had mere seconds to get out before it did. This is n
ot a time to be bullying or harassing this person (and one should never do t
hat).

Let’s look at the evidence as it comes in, but hold off from judging until
we know the truth of what happened and why

之前 ModelS Plaid 起火的事有更多消息披漏

CNBC說
車子起火的時候 駕駛在車上
並且包含車主律師的聲明
還有NHTSA的相關發言

路透社說
車主是一位 executive entrepreneur
他當時被困在車上
律師說最後用暴力才弄開門下車

律師說
這是一個可怕的經歷
呼籲停駛這款車
直到問題被找出來解決

彭博社說
車主是Bart Smith，是Susquehanna International私募基金的負責人，
該公司有約11億鎂的特斯拉股票

後來有網友指出
這家公司在2019時披露有大量的特斯拉空單
然後就是懷疑這件起火事件是空方惡意破壞
----
Sent from BePTT on my HTC 2Q55300

--