PTT評價

Re: [新聞] 高端疫苗報告等一年 為何遲不公布?

看板HatePolitics標題Re: [新聞] 高端疫苗報告等一年 為何遲不公布?作者
moondark92
(明星黯月)
時間推噓 7 推:7 噓:0 →:6

: 噓 ottoo: 還在問保護力的智商是有問題嗎?我就問莫得納還是bnt保護力 09/10 13:36: → ottoo: 是多少?有當初說的90以上嗎? 09/10 13:36
保護力不只是確診的保護力,還有住院甚至重症死亡的保護力,
雖然不是隨機分派對照實驗,但新加坡最近發布了一個omicron期間BNT孩童保護力報告

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Omicron in Children 5 to 11 Years
of Age
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2203209

Among partially vaccinated children, vaccine effectiveness was 13.6% (95%
confidence interval [CI], 11.7 to 15.5) against all SARS-CoV-2 infections,
24.3% (95% CI, 19.5 to 28.9) against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and
42.3% (95% CI, 24.9 to 55.7) against Covid-19–related hospitalization; in
fully vaccinated children, vaccine effectiveness was 36.8% (95% CI, 35.3 to
38.2), 65.3% (95% CI, 62.0 to 68.3), and 82.7% (95% CI, 74.8 to 88.2),
respectively.

完整接種BNT疫苗的孩童,通報感染保護力36.8%,PCR確診保護力65.3%, 住院保護力82.7%就不知道高端的這幾項保護力分別是多少?

幾個月前英國也有一篇omicron流行期間real world數據分析

Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2119451

vaccine effectiveness after two BNT162b2 doses was 65.5% (95% confidence
interval [CI], 63.9 to 67.0) at 2 to 4 weeks, dropping to 8.8% (95% CI, 7.0
to 10.5) at 25 or more weeks. Among ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 primary course
recipients, vaccine effectiveness increased to 62.4% (95% CI, 61.8 to 63.0)
at 2 to 4 weeks after a BNT162b2 booster before decreasing to 39.6% (95% CI,
38.0 to 41.1) at 10 or more weeks. Among BNT162b2 primary course recipients,vaccine effectiveness increased to 67.2% (95% CI, 66.5 to 67.8) at 2 to 4
weeks after a BNT162b2 booster before declining to 45.7% (95% CI, 44.7 to
46.7) at 10 or more weeks.
Vaccine effectiveness after a ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
primary course increased to 70.1% (95% CI, 69.5 to 70.7) at 2 to 4 weeks
after an mRNA-1273 booster and decreased to 60.9% (95% CI, 59.7 to 62.1) at 5to 9 weeks. After a BNT162b2 primary course, the mRNA-1273 booster increased
vaccine effectiveness to 73.9% (95% CI, 73.1 to 74.6) at 2 to 4 weeks;
vaccine effectiveness fell to 64.4% (95% CI, 62.6 to 66.1) at 5 to 9 weeks.

3劑BNT打完2-4周保護力67.2%,10周後保護力還有45.7%

台灣疾管署手上握有全民新冠疫苗接種資料,也有全民確診通報資料,
如果有心分析的話,應該也能統計出高端的保護力數據

--

※ PTT 留言評論
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.249.212.201 (臺灣)
PTT 網址

zingy09/10 15:46本文違反數位中介法,已被刪除。

didder09/10 15:48問就是機密三十年

jason48609/10 15:52數字好看 早就公布吹翻啦

mepass09/10 15:54其他幾個疫苗對o保護力都那麼差 高端想當然不會太好

mepass09/10 15:55反正沒公布就不會被打臉

online080109/10 15:56每次問高端的保護力就沒幾個推文,哈哈,死忠仔都不知

online080109/10 15:56道怎麼護航了吧

sonatafm209/10 16:08啊狼勒? 不用扯BNT你高端保護力報告是寫在標案裡要交

sonatafm209/10 16:08的 我們就來看衛福部誰敢簽名驗收

※ 編輯: moondark92 (111.249.212.201 臺灣), 09/10/2022 16:23:16

zukidelko09/10 17:58值得討論的都是被低調的

v1979111909/10 18:15封存就不需要知道

ymsc3010209/10 18:36現在常見的護航變成病毒變太多保護力沒意義了各牌都差

ymsc3010209/10 18:39當初一直強調扶植國產技術很重要 結果檢視都不給人檢視